In re Kinney

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Kinney

755 N.E.2d 163, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 1100, 2001 WL 1098257

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 7, 2001

DocketNo. 45S00-0108-DI-356

StatusPublished

This text of 755 N.E.2d 163 (In re Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kinney, 755 N.E.2d 163, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 1100, 2001 WL 1098257 (Ind. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f), petitions this Court to direct the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to respond to the Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against him and sent to his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent should be ordered to show cause to this Court why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Commission a written response to pending allegations of professional misconduct and sent to his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(10)(f), the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, is hereby [164]*164directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Disciplinary Commission a written response to pending allegations of misconduct requiring a written response and sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to serve a certified copy of this order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to him personally, or by sending to him a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event the personal service or service by registered or certified mail cannot be obtained upon the respondent, a certified copy of this Order shall be served on the Clerk of this Court as agent for the respondent as provided in Admis.Dise. R.

The Clerk of this Court is further directed to provide notice of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and its attorney of record.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f), petitions this Court to direct the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to respond to the Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against him and sent to his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent should be ordered to show cause to this Court why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Commission a written response to pending allegations of professional misconduct and sent to his official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(10)(f), the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, is hereby [164]*164directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Disciplinary Commission a written response to pending allegations of misconduct requiring a written response and sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to serve a certified copy of this order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to him personally, or by sending to him a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event the personal service or service by registered or certified mail cannot be obtained upon the respondent, a certified copy of this Order shall be served on the Clerk of this Court as agent for the respondent as provided in Admis.Dise. R.

The Clerk of this Court is further directed to provide notice of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and its attorney of record.

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 N.E.2d 163, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 1100, 2001 WL 1098257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kinney-ind-2001.