In re Kingston Stone

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kingston Stone

20 A.2d 659, 20 N.J. Misc. 6, 1941 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 30

DecidedJune 21, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.2d 659 (In re Kingston Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kingston Stone, 20 A.2d 659, 20 N.J. Misc. 6, 1941 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 30 (N.J. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

.This candidate matriculated at law school in September, 1938, and has graduated. He filed the required qualifying certificate but failed to file in time the certificate of registration with a counselor-at-law because unaware of the rule at that time, and asks that the registration filed in October, 1938, be considered effective as of the earlier date.

This case seems to be clearly within the lines of the Evers case, Application of Evers, 124 N. J. L. 97, and the application will be granted.

It appears by another certificate that this candidate has been drafted and will be short of his office clerkship at the time of the examination, and asks leave to take the examination and continue the clerkship afterwards. This privilege is frequently allowed and will be allowed in the present case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

.This candidate matriculated at law school in September, 1938, and has graduated. He filed the required qualifying certificate but failed to file in time the certificate of registration with a counselor-at-law because unaware of the rule at that time, and asks that the registration filed in October, 1938, be considered effective as of the earlier date.

This case seems to be clearly within the lines of the Evers case, Application of Evers, 124 N. J. L. 97, and the application will be granted.

It appears by another certificate that this candidate has been drafted and will be short of his office clerkship at the time of the examination, and asks leave to take the examination and continue the clerkship afterwards. This privilege is frequently allowed and will be allowed in the present case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.2d 659, 20 N.J. Misc. 6, 1941 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kingston-stone-nj-1941.