In Re Kingsley

161 B.R. 995, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 6, 1994 WL 4742
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
DecidedJanuary 5, 1994
Docket18-21028
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 161 B.R. 995 (In Re Kingsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Kingsley, 161 B.R. 995, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 6, 1994 WL 4742 (Mo. 1994).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Agribank, FCB (“Agribank”) moved this Court to lift the automatic stay on 933 acres of real estate. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G) over which the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a), and 157(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, I terminate the automatic stay as to the 933 acres of real estate.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Agribank obtained a default judgment against debtors in the Circuit Court of Lawrence County, Missouri on May 1, 1992, in the original amount of $382,148.38. Agri-bank proceeded to execute against all personal and real property of the debtors. Debtors filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) on March 16,1993. Agribank and the Chapter 12 trustee moved this Court to dismiss the bankruptcy or convert the case to one under Chapter 7 of the Code. Following a hearing on this matter on July 29, 1993, this Court found debtors had committed fraud in connection with the case, and, therefore, converted the case to Chapter 7. 11 U.S.C. § 1208(d). The conversion to Chapter 7 has since been affirmed by the District Court.

Debtors’ amended bankruptcy schedules list as an asset of the estate 933 acres of real property (the “Farm”) in Lawrence County, Missouri described as follows:

Tract No. 1: The south half of the southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 29, Range 28; and the south half of Lot 2 of the southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 29, Range 27, Lawrence County, Missouri.
Tract No. 2: The north half of the southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 29, Range 27, Lawrence County, Missouri.
Tract No. 3: The north half of the southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 29, Range 27, Lawrence County, Missouri.
Tract No. 4: The east half of the southwest quarter of Section 20, Except the south 420 feet thereof; the northwest quarter of Section 18; the southeast quarter of Section 21; Lot 1 of the southwest quarter of Section 6; the north half of Lot 2 of the southwest quarter of Section 6; the west ]4th of the west half of the southeast quarter of Section 6; and the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 28, Except a 2 acre tract of land in the southwest corner thereof; All in Township 29 north, Range 27 west of the Fifth Principal Meridian. Also, the East half of the northeast quarter of Section 13, in Township 29 north, Range 28 west of the Fifth principal Meridian, all being located in Lawrence County, Missouri.

Bank’s Exh. # 4. Debtors’ schedules list the value of the Farm to be $374,741.00. Id. The schedules also indicate that the First National Bank of Mount Vernon has a secured claim against the Farm in the amount of $337,456.00. The judicial lien of Agribank is a junior lien on such real estate.

A hearing on Agribank’s motion was held on December 23, 1993. At that time, the Chapter 7 trustee stipulated that there is no equity in the Farm and informed the Court of his intent to abandon the property. Debtors appeared pro se and objected to Agri-bank’s motion to lift stay, claiming they had satisfied their debt to Agribank.

DISCUSSION

The automatic stay, which mandates that each and every creditor of the debtor cease *997 all collection efforts and foreclosure actions upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition, is one of the fundamental bankruptcy protections provided by the Code. Section 362(a) of the Code defines the scope of the automatic stay and provides in relevant part:

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under ... this title ... operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of—
(2) the enforcement, against the debt- or or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title;

11 U.S.C. 362(a)(2). However, the Code permits creditors to obtain relief from the stay if their interests would be harmed by its continuation. Section 362(d) sets forth the requirements for a creditor to obtain relief from the automatic stay and provides in relevant part:

(d) On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the stay provided under subsection (a) of this section, such as by terminating, annulling, modifying, or conditioning such stay—
(2) with respect to a stay of an act against property under subsection (a) of this section, if—
(A) the debtor does not have an equity in such property; and
(B) such property is not necessary to an effective reorganization.

11 U.S.C. 362(d)(2). This case was converted from Chapter 12 to Chapter 7 on July 29, 1993, so the Farm is no longer necessary for an effective reorganization. Rocket City Federal Credit Union v. Kennemer (In re Kennemer), 143 B.R. 275, 280 n. 10 (N.D.Ala. 1992); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lyons (In re Lyons), 19 B.R. 66, 67 (Bankr. N.D.Ga.1982); 11 U.S.C. 362(d)(2)(B). Therefore, the only issues remaining are whether Agribank has a valid lien against the Farm, and whether debtors have equity in the Farm.

Agribank introduced into evidence a legal description of the Farm which indicates that it is located in Lawrence County, Missouri. See Bank’s Exh. #4. Agribank also introduced into evidence a certified copy of a judgment issued in the Circuit Court of Lawrence County, Missouri (Case No. CV0387-000264CC) on May 1, 1992. Bank’s Exh. # 2. The judgment indicates it was issued against Charlene K. Kingsley and Jay W. Kingsley, the plaintiffs in the Lawrence County action, and provides as follows:

Judgment in favor of Federal Land Bank/ Farm Credit Bank 1 on counts 2, 3, and 4. On Defs. counterclaim in the amount of $387,148.38 with interest from 5/1/92 at 13.5% per annum.

See id. The exhibit was admitted over debtors’ objection. Agribank also introduced into evidence, over debtors’ objection, a “Judgment Worksheet” indicating the balance due on its judgment debt as of December 23, 1993, to be $480,451.73.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Smith
245 B.R. 622 (W.D. Missouri, 2000)
Prestwood v. United States (In Re Prestwood)
185 B.R. 358 (M.D. Alabama, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 B.R. 995, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 6, 1994 WL 4742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kingsley-mowb-1994.