In re King
This text of 131 N.W. 820 (In re King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Practically the only difference between this case and In re Agnew, p. 306, post, is that in this case plaintiff purchased the Uneeda Biscuit of the agent of the manufacturer, in this state, after the bundle or package in which the goods were imported had been broken, when the smaller units were purchased by plaintiff, exposed for sale and sold by him at retail. The same principles of law govern as in the Agnew case, and the decision therein is followed.
The petition is denied, and plaintiff is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Lancaster county.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 N.W. 820, 89 Neb. 298, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-king-neb-1911.