In re King
This text of 104 So. 3d 416 (In re King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|,ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, failed to refund unearned fees, and failed to timely remit funds to a third-party medical provider. Respondent initially did not cooperate with the ODC in its investigation of the complaints filed against her. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Rebecca J. King, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18981, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent make full restitution to her victims, with legal interest, as set forth in the petition for consent discipline.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [417]*417with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 So. 3d 416, 2012 WL 6554535, 2012 La. LEXIS 3416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-king-la-2012.