In Re King

601 So. 2d 657, 1992 WL 136515
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 5, 1992
Docket92-B-0441
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 657 (In Re King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re King, 601 So. 2d 657, 1992 WL 136515 (La. 1992).

Opinion

601 So.2d 657 (1992)

In re Charles R. KING. Disciplinary Proceeding

No. 92-B-0441.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 5, 1992.
Rehearing Denied June 26, 1992.

Charles R. King, Baton Rouge, for respondent.

*658 James R. Barrow, G. Fred Ours, Elizabeth A. Alston, New Orleans, for LSBA.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee No. 7 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the recommendation by a seven-to-six vote of the Disciplinary Board to dismiss the proceeding against respondent be rejected. The disciplinary violation was proved by clear and convincing evidence, and some form of sanction is appropriate. Moreover, the factors considered by the Disciplinary Board in recommending dismissal of the proceeding were principally in the nature of mitigating factors.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Charles R. King be issued a reprimand for his conduct in this matter. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

DENNIS, J., dissents and would affirm the Disciplinary Board's determination.

CALOGERO, C.J., dissents. The disciplinary board's resolution was correct.

WATSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Succession of Cook
189 So. 3d 409 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
In Re Caulfield
683 So. 2d 714 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 657, 1992 WL 136515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-king-la-1992.