In Re King
This text of 601 So. 2d 657 (In Re King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Charles R. KING. Disciplinary Proceeding
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Charles R. King, Baton Rouge, for respondent.
*658 James R. Barrow, G. Fred Ours, Elizabeth A. Alston, New Orleans, for LSBA.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee No. 7 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the recommendation by a seven-to-six vote of the Disciplinary Board to dismiss the proceeding against respondent be rejected. The disciplinary violation was proved by clear and convincing evidence, and some form of sanction is appropriate. Moreover, the factors considered by the Disciplinary Board in recommending dismissal of the proceeding were principally in the nature of mitigating factors.
Accordingly, it is ordered that Charles R. King be issued a reprimand for his conduct in this matter. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.
DENNIS, J., dissents and would affirm the Disciplinary Board's determination.
CALOGERO, C.J., dissents. The disciplinary board's resolution was correct.
WATSON, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
601 So. 2d 657, 1992 WL 136515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-king-la-1992.