In Re King

16 P.2d 694, 128 Cal. App. 27, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 262
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 2, 1932·No. Docket No. 2294.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

CRAIG, Acting P. J.

The petitioner asks to be released through habeas corpus from detention by the chief of police of the city of Los Angeles. She was arrested on a morals charge, examined physically in the usual course by employees of the health department, and it appears that such examination indicated that she was afflicted with a venereal disease. This fact, however, she disputes, has demanded another examination, which has been denied, and refuses to undergo medical treatment. The health department has required her detention in quarantine until such time as she may safely be released. We are of the opinion that *28 the law only requires that there be probable cause to believe that a person so held has an infectious disease which is communicable in order to justify the authorities in retaining such person in quarantine. The person so held may be detained legally until there is sufficient showing that the probable cause no longer exists.

An order has heretofore been made remanding the petitioner and dismissing the writ.

Thompson (Ira F.), J., and Stephens, J., pro tern., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re King, 16 P.2d 694, 128 Cal. App. 27, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 262 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

16 P.2d 694 (In Re King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Halko
246 Cal. App. 2d 553 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
In Re Martin
188 P.2d 287 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)