In re King

72 F.2d 925, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 1934
DocketNo. 7472
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.2d 925 (In re King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re King, 72 F.2d 925, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730 (5th Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tho petition of appellant for writ of mandamus to compel the District Judge to sign a bill of exceptions in this ease is denied; it appearing from petition of appellant that no bill of exceptions was presented to the District Judge within the time required by law.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.2d 925, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-king-ca5-1934.