In re Kimmel
This text of 969 A.2d 1066 (In re Kimmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-341 and DRB 07-342, concluding that ANDREW M. KIMMEL, formerly of CEDAR KNOLLS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since May 24, 2006, should be censured for violating RPC 1.16(d) (failure to promptly deliver client’s file), RPC 5.5(a)(1) (practicing law while ineligible), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that ANDREW M. KIMMEL is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent continue to comply with Rule 1:20— 20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 A.2d 1066, 198 N.J. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kimmel-nj-2009.