In re Kimm

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kimm

924 A.2d 1191, 191 N.J. 552, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 714

DecidedJune 21, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 924 A.2d 1191 (In re Kimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kimm, 924 A.2d 1191, 191 N.J. 552, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 714 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-338, concluding that MICHAEL S. KIMM of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be censured for violating RPC 3.1(bringing a proceeding knowing or reasonably believing that it is frivolous), RPC 8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL S. KIMM is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-338, concluding that MICHAEL S. KIMM of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be censured for violating RPC 3.1(bringing a proceeding knowing or reasonably believing that it is frivolous), RPC 8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL S. KIMM is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

924 A.2d 1191, 191 N.J. 552, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kimm-nj-2007.