In re: Kimberly L. Marshall

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 12, 2017
Docket17-BG-695
StatusPublished

This text of In re: Kimberly L. Marshall (In re: Kimberly L. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Kimberly L. Marshall, (D.C. 2017).

Opinion

Non'ce: Tln's opinion is subject to formal revision before publication fn the Atlonn`e and Mnryloml Reporters. Users ore requested to notify the Clerk of the Corn‘t of any formal errors so that corrections may be mode before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRlCT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. l7-BG-695

lN RE: KIMBERLY L. l\/IARSHALL` Respondent. DDN: 125-15 An Administratively Suspended l\/Iember ofthe Bar of`the District of`Columbia Court of`Appea|s

Bar Registration No. 460886 BEFORE: Thompson, Associate ludge, and Farrel| and Reid, Senior.ludges. ORDER

On consideration of`the certified consent order from the state of"Virginia that imposed an indefinite impairment suspension, this court`s lu|y ZI. 2017, order suspending respondent and directing her to show cause why she should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. Xl § l3, and the statement of`Disciplinary C`ounse|, and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response to the court`s order or a D.C. Bar R. Xl, §l4 (g) affidavit. it is

ORDERED that Kimber|y L. l\/|arshall is hereby indefinitely suspended From the practice of`|aw in the District of`Co|umbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent`s attention is directed to the requirements ol`D.C. Bar R. Xl § 13 (g) f`or reinstatement1 as well as D.C. Bar R. Xl § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions ol`Rule Xl § |() (c) dealing with the timing of` eligibility t`or reinstatement as related to compliance with D.C. Bar R. Xl § 14, including the filing of`the required affidavit

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Kimberly L. Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kimberly-l-marshall-dc-2017.