In re Kim D.

120 A.D.2d 968, 502 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57071
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified, on the law, by deleting the last ordering paragraph and otherwise order affirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court to set the amount of restitution. Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to support the court’s adjudication that respondent committed an act which, if done by an adult, would constitute third degree robbery. The court erred, however, in delegating to the Probation Department the authority to fix the amount of restitution (see, Family Ct Act § 353.6 [1] [a]; People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152; People v De Berry, 117 AD2d 1006). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J. — juvenile delinquency.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kim D., 120 A.D.2d 968, 502 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

120 A.D.2d 968 (In re Kim D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Stojan S.
132 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)