In re Killian
This text of 66 A.D.3d 1083 (In re Killian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1988. She maintains a law office in the Town of Liberty, Sullivan County.
By decision dated March 1, 2007, respondent was suspended from practice for six months, which suspension was stayed upon certain conditions (Matter of Killian, 38 AD3d 994 [2007]). By decision dated May 29, 2008, this Court denied respondent’s application to terminate the stayed suspension without prejudice to renewal in one year from the date of the decision (Matter of Killian, 51 AD3d 1363 [2008]).
Respondent again moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that all of the conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.
Mercure, J.P, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decision dated March 1, 2007 is terminated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A.D.3d 1083, 885 N.Y.S.2d 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-killian-nyappdiv-2009.