Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Kihl

In re Kihl

118 A.D.2d 823, 500 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54671
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Kihl. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 A.D.2d 393 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1986·Published

Opinion

— Application by petitioner, a suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

Application denied. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kihl, 118 A.D.2d 823, 500 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

118 A.D.2d 823 (In re Kihl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.