In Re Kienstra

Washington Supreme Court

In Re Kienstra

282 P. 221, 154 Wash. 153, 1929 Wash. LEXIS 752

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 17, 1929

DocketNo. C.D. 1178. En Banc.

StatusPublished

This text of 282 P. 221 (In Re Kienstra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Kienstra, 282 P. 221, 154 Wash. 153, 1929 Wash. LEXIS 752 (Wash. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING. In due time after the decision in this case, reported in151 Wn. 424, 276 P. 294, a petition for a rehearing was filed and granted. The case was reargued before the court En Banc on October 1, 1929, and upon due consideration by the court, a majority of the judges are of the opinion that the minority opinion as contained in that decision should prevail;

Wherefore, it is ordered and adjudged that Walter G. Kienstra be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year from the date of the filing of this opinion. *Page 154

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REHEARING. In due time after the decision in this case, reported in151 Wn. 424, 276 P. 294, a petition for a rehearing was filed and granted. The case was reargued before the court En Banc on October 1, 1929, and upon due consideration by the court, a majority of the judges are of the opinion that the minority opinion as contained in that decision should prevail;

Wherefore, it is ordered and adjudged that Walter G. Kienstra be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year from the date of the filing of this opinion. *Page 154

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 P. 221, 154 Wash. 153, 1929 Wash. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kienstra-wash-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack