In re Kiegel

804 A.2d 1169, 174 N.J. 299
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 9, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 804 A.2d 1169 (In re Kiegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kiegel, 804 A.2d 1169, 174 N.J. 299 (N.J. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-396, concluding that FREDERICK A. KIE-GEL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating of RPC 1.8(f) (improper acceptance of fee from third party);

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that in the circumstances presented an admonition is the appropriate level of discipline for respondent’s misconduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERICK A. KIEGEL is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the State Grand Jury Investigation
983 A.2d 1097 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
804 A.2d 1169, 174 N.J. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kiegel-nj-2002.