In re Kiegel

804 A.2d 1169, 174 N.J. 299
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 9, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-396, concluding that FREDERICK A. KIE-GEL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating of RPC 1.8(f) (improper acceptance of fee from third party);

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that in the circumstances presented an admonition is the appropriate level of discipline for respondent’s misconduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERICK A. KIEGEL is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kiegel, 804 A.2d 1169, 174 N.J. 299 (N.J. 2002).

804 A.2d 1169 (In re Kiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the State Grand Jury Investigation
983 A.2d 1097 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009)