In Re Kiberu
This text of 262 S.W.3d 806 (In Re Kiberu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case may involve potential healthcare liability claims. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code ch. 74. The trial court authorized presuit depositions pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. The court of appeals denied mandamus relief. 237 S.W.3d 445. Without hearing oral argument, see Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus, and direct the court of appeals to withdraw its previous opinion and reconsider relators’ petition in light of In re Jorden, 249 S.W.3d 416 (Tex.2008). We are confident the court will comply with our directive, and the writ will issue only if the court fails to do so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 S.W.3d 806, 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1381, 2008 Tex. LEXIS 758, 2008 WL 4000808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kiberu-tex-2008.