in Re Kia Motors America, Inc.
This text of in Re Kia Motors America, Inc. (in Re Kia Motors America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00086-CV
IN RE KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-77645
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 11, 2022, relator Kia Motors America, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s January 31, 2022 discovery order requiring Kia Motors America to produce information and material in response to Beverlie Alfred’s requests for production 1, 3–11, 16–17, 23–25, 27, 29, 31–33, 36.
Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kia Motors America, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kia-motors-america-inc-texapp-2022.