in Re: Khalil Pakideh
This text of in Re: Khalil Pakideh (in Re: Khalil Pakideh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-06-454-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: KHALIL PAKIDEH, ET AL.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
On August 15, 2006, relators, Khalil Pakideh, Soudabeh Ahadi, and Alma Investments Incorporated d/b/a Texas Alma Investments, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which they allege that on June 22, 2006, respondent, the Honorable Abel C. Limas, Presiding Judge of the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, abused his discretion by denying relators’ motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel.
Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the respondent to reverse the order entered June 22, 2006 and enter an order granting relators’ motion to disqualify.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 28th day of September, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Khalil Pakideh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-khalil-pakideh-texapp-2006.