in Re K.H.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 11, 2014
Docket09-14-00469-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re K.H. (in Re K.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re K.H., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-14-00469-CV _________________

IN RE K.H.

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, K.H., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging an

order signed on August 25, 2014, by a visiting judge for the 418th District Court of

Montgomery County, appointing the Texas Department of Family and Protective

Services as temporary managing conservator of K.H.’s child, N.H. See Tex. Fam.

Code Ann. § 105.001(a) (West 2014). K.H. contends the trial court abused its

discretion in failing to return N.H. to her. The Department argues that the trial

court made appropriate findings supported by sufficient evidence presented during

the adversary hearing. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 262.201(c) (West 2014). After

careful review of the relator’s petition, the Department’s response, and the records

1 submitted by the parties, we conclude that the relator has not established her

entitlement to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. The petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on November 10, 2014 Opinion Delivered December 11, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 105.001
Texas FA § 105.001(a)
§ 262.201
Texas FA § 262.201(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re K.H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kh-texapp-2014.