in Re: Kevin McWilliams, D/B/A McWilliams Monument Company
This text of in Re: Kevin McWilliams, D/B/A McWilliams Monument Company (in Re: Kevin McWilliams, D/B/A McWilliams Monument Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 21, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00232-CV
IN RE KEVIN McWILLIAMS, d/b/a
McWILLIAMS MONUMENT COMPANY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On March 8, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004-05); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator asked that we direct the Honorable Kenneth Keeling, the presiding judge of the 278th District Court in Grimes County, to set aside his nunc pro tunc order retaining the underlying case on the docket.[1]
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 21, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Frost.
[1] The underlying case is styled Carolyn Poret Stark v. Kevin McWilliams, d/b/a McWilliams Monument Company, filed under cause number 29,305 in the 278th District Court of Grimes County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Kevin McWilliams, D/B/A McWilliams Monument Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kevin-mcwilliams-dba-mcwilliams-monument-com-texapp-2005.