in Re Kevin Lee Buhl
This text of in Re Kevin Lee Buhl (in Re Kevin Lee Buhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00478-CR No. 10-19-00482-CR
IN RE KEVIN LEE BUHL
Original Proceeding
OPINION
In these proceedings, Kevin Lee Buhl seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court
compelling the trial court to withdraw an order to withhold funds from his inmate
account. In his petition, Buhl relies upon a number of cases that have been overruled,
either directly or by implication, by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals or the Texas
Supreme Court. The procedure necessary to complain about an order to withhold funds
from an inmate account was described in Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. 2009). That
procedure is to file a motion complaining about the withdrawal order which should be
filed with the trial court clerk for the trial court that signed the order. If the trial court then denies the relief requested in the motion, then an appeal, which will be a civil
proceeding, can be taken from that denial.
Because another procedure is available to Buhl, he is not entitled to relief by
mandamus. Accordingly, Buhl’s petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Pet. denied Opinion delivered and filed January 8, 2020 Publish [OT06]
In Re Buhl Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kevin Lee Buhl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kevin-lee-buhl-texapp-2020.