in Re Kevin J. Rezendes

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 9, 2009
Docket04-09-00749-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Kevin J. Rezendes (in Re Kevin J. Rezendes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Kevin J. Rezendes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00749-CR

IN RE Kevin J. REZENDES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 9, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 20, 2009, relator Kevin Rezendes filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion to disqualify his attorney. To obtain a

writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to consider and rule on a motion, a relator must

establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act; (2) was asked

to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do so. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). The record before us fails to establish relator is entitled

to the relief requested. Relator alleges Mr. James Tocci was appointed to represent him in the

underlying criminal proceeding and relator alleges he filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Tocci because

1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-10097, styled State of Texas v. Kevin J. Rezendes, pending in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sharon MacRae presiding. 04-09-00749-CR

counsel has failed to communicate with him. This court has been informed by the trial court clerk

that no attorney has yet been appointed to represent relator and no motions are pending in trial cause

number 2009-CR-10097.2

Accordingly, because relator has not met his burden of providing a record establishing that

a motion was properly filed and has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time, he has

not provided this court with grounds to usurp the trial court’s inherent authority to control its own

docket. See In re Mendoza, 131 S.W.3d 167, 168 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).

DO NOT PUBLISH

2 … W e note James Tocci has been appointed to represent the relator in a different matter in trial cause number 2009-CR-4467 pending in Bexar County.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Molina
94 S.W.3d 885 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
In Re Mendoza
131 S.W.3d 167 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Kevin J. Rezendes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kevin-j-rezendes-texapp-2009.