in Re Kevin Doty and Elizabeth Doty
This text of in Re Kevin Doty and Elizabeth Doty (in Re Kevin Doty and Elizabeth Doty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2017
No. 04-17-00031-CV
IN RE Kevin Doty and Elizabeth DOTY
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On January 19, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than February 8, 2017. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relator’s request for emergency relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in the underlying case are stayed pending final resolution of the petition filed in this court.
It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2017.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CC-15-100, styled Richard Davidson v. Kevin Doty, pending in the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas, the Honorable Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kevin Doty and Elizabeth Doty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kevin-doty-and-elizabeth-doty-texapp-2017.