In re Kessler

Second Circuit

In re Kessler

180 F. 979, 103 C.C.A. 582, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 14, 1910

DocketNos. 283, 284

StatusPublished

This text of 180 F. 979 (In re Kessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kessler, 180 F. 979, 103 C.C.A. 582, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811 (2d Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinions

NOYES, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The majority of the court are of the opinion that the District Court was right in answering the question certified to it by the referee in the affirmative and in approving the allowance of the claims. But we think it unnecessary to add anything to the very careful consideration of the subject contained in Judge Hand’s opinion.

The orders of the District Court are affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the District Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOYES, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The majority of the court are of the opinion that the District Court was right in answering the question certified to it by the referee in the affirmative and in approving the allowance of the claims. But we think it unnecessary to add anything to the very careful consideration of the subject contained in Judge Hand’s opinion.

The orders of the District Court are affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the District Judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 F. 979, 103 C.C.A. 582, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kessler-ca2-1910.