In re Kesselman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kesselman

100 A.D.2d 606, 473 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17587

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 606 (In re Kesselman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kesselman, 100 A.D.2d 606, 473 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by Edward C. Kesselman, pursuant to section 690.19 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR), for an advanced ruling with respect to applicant’s past conduct pertaining to his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, on March 16,1977, in the Supreme Court, New York County. The Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts voted unanimously for the proposition that under the circumstances, the conviction would not, in and of itself, preclude his certification by said committee when and if all other requirements are met. I This court adopts the finding of the committee and finds in favor of the applicant and determines that the above-mentioned prior conviction and the acts committed by applicant which resulted therein, would not operate to disqualify the applicant on character grounds, from being admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by Edward C. Kesselman, pursuant to section 690.19 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR), for an advanced ruling with respect to applicant’s past conduct pertaining to his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, on March 16,1977, in the Supreme Court, New York County. The Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts voted unanimously for the proposition that under the circumstances, the conviction would not, in and of itself, preclude his certification by said committee when and if all other requirements are met. I This court adopts the finding of the committee and finds in favor of the applicant and determines that the above-mentioned prior conviction and the acts committed by applicant which resulted therein, would not operate to disqualify the applicant on character grounds, from being admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 606, 473 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kesselman-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack