In re Kerwin

Third Circuit

In re Kerwin

126 F. App'x 579

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 2005

DocketNo. 04-4408

StatusPublished

This text of 126 F. App'x 579 (In re Kerwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kerwin, 126 F. App'x 579 (3d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ryan Kerwin, a Pennsylvania inmate serving a five to ten-year sentence in prison imposed in January 1999 for various offenses, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Kerwin seeks to compel the District Court to render a final decision on his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 11, 2005, subsequent to the filing of Kerwin’s mandamus petition, the District Court entered an order denying his § 2254 petition. Because the District Court has afforded Kerwin the relief sought, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ryan Kerwin, a Pennsylvania inmate serving a five to ten-year sentence in prison imposed in January 1999 for various offenses, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Kerwin seeks to compel the District Court to render a final decision on his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 11, 2005, subsequent to the filing of Kerwin’s mandamus petition, the District Court entered an order denying his § 2254 petition. Because the District Court has afforded Kerwin the relief sought, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 F. App'x 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kerwin-ca3-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack