In re Kervick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kervick

306 A.D.2d 544, 759 N.Y.S.2d 697, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 544 (In re Kervick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kervick, 306 A.D.2d 544, 759 N.Y.S.2d 697, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinions

—Per Curiam.

Respondent, was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981. He practiced law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1975.

Effective November 19, 2002, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent for a period of three months for committing a criminal act that reflected adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer. Respondent violated New Jersey statutes prohibiting the possession and use of cocaine and drug paraphernalia.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent pursuant to this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

[545]*545We grant petitioner’s motion and reciprocally suspend respondent from practice for a period of six months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI