In re Kersey

881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 130, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1117
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 20, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-019, concluding that as matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), GEORGE E. KER-SEY of FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1963, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(c) (disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE E. KERSEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kersey, 881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 130, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1117 (N.J. 2005).

881 A.2d 1240 (In re Kersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related