In re Kersey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kersey

881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 130, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1117

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 20, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 881 A.2d 1240 (In re Kersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kersey, 881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 130, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1117 (N.J. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-019, concluding that as matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), GEORGE E. KER-SEY of FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1963, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(c) (disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE E. KERSEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI