In re Kerrigan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kerrigan

683 A.2d 833, 146 N.J. 557, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1110

DecidedOctober 29, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 683 A.2d 833 (In re Kerrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kerrigan, 683 A.2d 833, 146 N.J. 557, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1110 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 23,1996, having filed with the Supreme Court its decision concluding that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN of WESTMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994 and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from practice on May 16,1995, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months retroactive to May 16, 1995, on the basis of respondent’s plea of guilty to one count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A § 1341, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN of WEST-MONT is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months effective May 16,1995, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[558]*558ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 23,1996, having filed with the Supreme Court its decision concluding that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN of WESTMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994 and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from practice on May 16,1995, and who remains suspended at this time, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months retroactive to May 16, 1995, on the basis of respondent’s plea of guilty to one count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A § 1341, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN of WEST-MONT is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months effective May 16,1995, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[558]*558ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KERRIGAN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 A.2d 833, 146 N.J. 557, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kerrigan-nj-1996.