In re Kerr

Fourth Circuit

In re Kerr

633 F. App'x 167

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2016·No. No. 15-2497·Published

Opinion

[168] Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[168] Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Alan Kerr petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Kerr, 633 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 167 (In re Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related