In re Kephart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Kephart

829 A.2d 669

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 27, 2003

DocketNo. 830 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 829 A.2d 669 (In re Kephart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kephart, 829 A.2d 669 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on April 3, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James William Kephart to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James William Kephart is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on April 3, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James William Kephart to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James William Kephart is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 A.2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kephart-pa-2003.