In re Kenya A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kenya A.

237 A.D.2d 207, 655 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 207 (In re Kenya A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kenya A., 237 A.D.2d 207, 655 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1996, which, upon appellant’s admission that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the second degree, adjudicated her a juvenile delinquent and placed her with the Division for Youth for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Where appellant had a history of habitual truancy and volatile and assaultive behavior, the court properly determined that her placement with a private residential program, rather than probation, was the least restrictive alternative to protect both appellant and the public (Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milorias, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1996, which, upon appellant’s admission that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the second degree, adjudicated her a juvenile delinquent and placed her with the Division for Youth for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Where appellant had a history of habitual truancy and volatile and assaultive behavior, the court properly determined that her placement with a private residential program, rather than probation, was the least restrictive alternative to protect both appellant and the public (Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milorias, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 207, 655 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenya-a-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack