In Re Kent Kaddatz v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Kent Kaddatz v. the State of Texas (In Re Kent Kaddatz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-23-00336-CV
IN RE KENT KADDATZ, Relator § Original Proceeding
§ 43rd District Court of Parker County, Texas
§ Trial Court No. CV23-0960
§ November 2, 2023
§ Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth
JUDGMENT
This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and holds
that the petition should be conditionally granted. Accordingly, we conditionally grant
the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to vacate its order granting Oil Patch
Group, Inc.’s Rule 202 petition and render an order denying the same. Writ will issue
only if the trial court fails to comply.
It is further ordered that Real Party in Interest Oil Patch Group, Inc. shall pay
all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Kent Kaddatz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kent-kaddatz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.