In re Kennya S.

82 A.D.3d 577, 918 N.Y.2d 493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Kennya S.. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 A.D.3d 570

Opinion

The finding of neglect as against the mother was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f|; § 1046 [b] [i]). The mother’s false statement that she, and not the father, hit the subject child with a belt, did not, under the circumstances, establish that the mother had failed to exercise a minimum degree of care, or that the child was in imminent danger of being impaired as a result of the false statement (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368-369 [2004]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kennya S., 82 A.D.3d 577, 918 N.Y.2d 493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 577 (In re Kennya S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholson v. Scoppetta
820 N.E.2d 840 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)