in Re: Kenneth Richard Allison & Giselle Vernette Allison
This text of in Re: Kenneth Richard Allison & Giselle Vernette Allison (in Re: Kenneth Richard Allison & Giselle Vernette Allison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed June 5, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00593-CV
IN RE KENNETH RICHARD ALLISON & GISELLE VERNETTE ALLISON, Relators
____________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 22, 2003, relators filed an “Objection in the Nature of a Writ of Error,” complaining about an order of the 151st District Court. We construe relators’ filing to be a petition for writ of mandamus. Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); Tex. R. App. P. 52.
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Kenneth Richard Allison & Giselle Vernette Allison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenneth-richard-allison-giselle-vernette-all-texapp-2003.