In re: Kenneth Reid
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1656
In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1)
Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Roshaun Reid, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this
court compelling the district court and the Government to “settle negotiable instruments”
presented in the criminal proceedings against him. We conclude that Reid is not entitled
to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available
only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, LLC,
907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). The relief sought by Reid is not available by way of
mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: Kenneth Reid (In re: Kenneth Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.