in Re Kenneth Neuman
This text of in Re Kenneth Neuman (in Re Kenneth Neuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00340-CV
In re Kenneth Neuman
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Kenneth Neuman, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a “motion for
emergency relief,” which we have construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging
the legality of a protective order that Neuman claims was issued by the district court, as well as
the legality of a misdemeanor charge that Neuman claims was brought against him for allegedly
violating that order.1 In his petition, Neuman asks us to direct the district court to “dismiss the illegal
order” and to direct the Austin Police Department to “drop this illegal misdemeanor charge.” We
do not have mandamus jurisdiction over the Austin Police Department,2 and Neuman has failed
to demonstrate his entitlement to the extraordinary relief requested against the district court.3
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.4
1 No copies of the protective order or any other documents material to Neuman’s claim for relief have been filed with his petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a). 2 See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. 3 See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 4 See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland
Filed: May 27, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kenneth Neuman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenneth-neuman-texapp-2016.