In re Kenneth Michael R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kenneth Michael R.

2 A.D.3d 164, 767 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 164 (In re Kenneth Michael R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kenneth Michael R., 2 A.D.3d 164, 767 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[165]*165Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle Roberts, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2001, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to assist respondent to overcome her drug abuse, she continues to regularly use marijuana (see Matter of Tiwana M., 267 AD2d 144 [1999]). In addition, respondent missed or was late to some 20% of her biweekly visits, despite regular calls from the agency reminding her of the appointments (see id.). Termination of respondent’s parental rights was properly based on a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent will not be able to assume responsibility for the child in the near future, and that the child is thriving in foster care (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[165]*165Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle Roberts, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2001, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to assist respondent to overcome her drug abuse, she continues to regularly use marijuana (see Matter of Tiwana M., 267 AD2d 144 [1999]). In addition, respondent missed or was late to some 20% of her biweekly visits, despite regular calls from the agency reminding her of the appointments (see id.). Termination of respondent’s parental rights was properly based on a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent will not be able to assume responsibility for the child in the near future, and that the child is thriving in foster care (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 164, 767 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenneth-michael-r-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack