in Re Kenneth L. Buholtz

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 26, 2021
• Docket: 05-21-00254-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed July 26, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00254-CV

IN RE KENNETH L. BUHOLTZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-01691-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus challenges various discovery rulings

and the denial of his motion to transfer the case. Entitlement to mandamus relief

requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he

lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–

36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Because relator has not submitted an adequate record, we are unable to

conduct a meaningful review of his claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1).

Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to refiling a record that

complies with the Texas rules of appellate procedure. Also before the Court is relator’s motion to transfer records. We deny the

motion.

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE

210254F.P05

–2–