in Re Kenneth Dwayne Anderson
This text of in Re Kenneth Dwayne Anderson (in Re Kenneth Dwayne Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-20-00213-CV
IN RE KENNETH DWAYNE ANDERSON
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kenneth Dwayne Anderson seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court compelling
the trial court to withdraw an order to withhold funds from his inmate account. The
procedure necessary to complain about an order to withhold funds from an inmate
account was described in Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. 2009). See In re Buhl, Nos.
10-19-00478-CR, 10-19-00482-CR, 2020 WL 103808, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Jan. 8, 2020,
no pet.). That procedure is to file a motion complaining about the withdrawal order,
which should be filed with the trial court clerk for the trial court that signed the order. If
the trial court then denies the relief requested in the motion, then an appeal, which will be a civil proceeding, can be taken from that denial. There is nothing in the record before
us to indicate that Anderson filed a motion in the trial court complaining about the
withdrawal order.
Because another procedure is available to Anderson, he is not entitled to relief by
mandamus. Accordingly, Anderson’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed August 19, 2020 [OT06]
In re Anderson Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kenneth Dwayne Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenneth-dwayne-anderson-texapp-2020.