In re Kenneth Dayshawn J.

16 A.D.3d 158, 790 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2251
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 158 (In re Kenneth Dayshawn J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kenneth Dayshawn J., 16 A.D.3d 158, 790 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[159]*159Final orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant mother permanently neglected her three children, terminated her parental rights and placed the children in the custody of petitioners for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the mother’s argument, Foundling Hospital made diligent efforts to reunify her with the children, upon her release from prison and over the course of a year of multiple referrals to counseling and therapy, multiple service plan reviews, arrangements for potential visitation, and communications with service providers who assisted her. Foundling Hospital made it clear to the mother that the greatest impediment to the return of her children was her ongoing unwillingness to regularly participate in therapy. This therapy was critical because the children had suffered severe harm while under her care, and because she never acknowledged responsibility for the scalding event or her need for counseling. The mother’s irregular attendance at service plan reviews and other agency appointments, as well as her resistance to court-ordered therapy, supplied clear and convincing evidence of failure by an uncooperative parent to plan for the children’s future (Social Services Law § 384-b [7]), and warranted the permanent neglect finding (see Matter of Adrian M., 270 AD2d 93 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 757 [2000]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Marie G.
29 A.D.3d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Kianna Maria L.
26 A.D.3d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.3d 158, 790 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kenneth-dayshawn-j-nyappdiv-2005.