In Re Kenneth Chambless v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-25-00527-CR
IN RE KENNETH CHAMBLESS
Original Proceeding
435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 24-04-05352 & 24-04-05529
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Kenneth Chambless asks this Court to direct the trial court either to sever the trial of his two offenses and grant a speedy trial or dismiss the charges. Chambless concedes that he raised the complaints in motions he filed pro se and that he is currently represented by counsel in the trial court. Chambless argues the trial court should have granted Chambless leave to file pro se motions because his cases are “very unique” when compared to other cases with issues of insanity and competency to stand trial, in that Chambless offered to relinquish certain rights if his cases went to trial within 60 days.
To obtain mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law and what he seeks to compel is ministerial, involving no discretion. In re State ex rel. Best, 616 S.W.3d 594, 599 (Tex. Crim. App. 2021) (orig. proceeding). Criminal defendants are generally not entitled to hybrid representation, and “a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel.” Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). After reviewing the mandamus petition and the additional materials Chambless submitted with the petition, we conclude Chambless has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. Any pending motions addressed to this Court are denied as moot.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 27, 2026 Opinion Delivered January 28, 2026 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Kenneth Chambless v. the State of Texas (In Re Kenneth Chambless v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.