In Re. Kendrick Estate v. Neff

Supreme Court of Florida

In Re. Kendrick Estate v. Neff

134 So. 56, 101 Fla. 397

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 28, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for thé respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be,-, an the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for thé respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be,-, an the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

In Re. Kendrick Estate v. Neff, 134 So. 56, 101 Fla. 397 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

134 So. 56 (In Re. Kendrick Estate v. Neff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.