In re Kendall

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Kendall

421 S.E.2d 533, 262 Ga. 441

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 5, 1992

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 1020

StatusPublished

This text of 421 S.E.2d 533 (In re Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kendall, 421 S.E.2d 533, 262 Ga. 441 (Ga. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia filed a Notice of Discipline against M. Michael Kendall on July 20, 1992 alleging violations of various of the standards set forth in Bar Rule 4-102 and recommending disbarment. Kendall acknowledged service of the notice on August 13, 1992 and indicated his desire to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law in Georgia. The State Bar has expressed no objection to the proposed surrender and, as surrender of one’s license is tantamount to disbarment, Kendall’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in this state is hereby accepted. Kendall is reminded that he must comply with all requirements of Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham, Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia filed a Notice of Discipline against M. Michael Kendall on July 20, 1992 alleging violations of various of the standards set forth in Bar Rule 4-102 and recommending disbarment. Kendall acknowledged service of the notice on August 13, 1992 and indicated his desire to voluntarily surrender his license to practice law in Georgia. The State Bar has expressed no objection to the proposed surrender and, as surrender of one’s license is tantamount to disbarment, Kendall’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in this state is hereby accepted. Kendall is reminded that he must comply with all requirements of Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham, Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 S.E.2d 533, 262 Ga. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kendall-ga-1992.