In re Kelly
This text of 252 A.D. 887 (In re Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, confirming the report of the referee and directing John Sinosich to turn over certain bank books in the name of the decedent, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant, payable out of the fund, motion to confirm the report denied, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to make a decree awarding the property to appellant. The evidence sufficiently established that a gift causa mortis of the six savings bank books in question had been made by the decedent to appellant. Appeal from referee’s report dismissed. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 887, 300 N.Y.S. 139, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelly-nyappdiv-1937.