In re Kelly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kelly

137 A.3d 1195, 225 N.J. 335, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 574

DecidedJune 22, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.3d 1195 (In re Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kelly, 137 A.3d 1195, 225 N.J. 335, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 574 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-231, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 4(f) (default by respondent), that JOSEPH P. KELLY, formerly of KEARNY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), RPC 8.1(b), and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KELLY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-231, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 4(f) (default by respondent), that JOSEPH P. KELLY, formerly of KEARNY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), RPC 8.1(b), and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH P. KELLY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.3d 1195, 225 N.J. 335, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelly-nj-2016.