In re Kelly

E.D. Kentucky

In re Kelly

3 F. 219

DecidedJune 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. 219 (In re Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kelly, 3 F. 219 (E.D. Ky. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Bare, D. J.

In this case Caleb Kelly filed his petition, to he adjudged a bankrupt, on the second of May, 1878, and was so adjudged on the tenth of May, 1878.

He reported some encumbered real estate and a little personal property, but all” seems to have been set apart to him under the exemption laws.

oThe bankrupt filed his petition for a discharge February 15, 1879, and at the meeting some of his creditors opposed his discharge, and filed grounds why the discharge should not be granted. No further action seems to have been taken by tho. bankrupt. Berry, Jones & Hiter, creditors, who had proven their claims, filed a petition in this court October 8, 1879, asking to he allowed to pursue their legal remedies in the state courts against the bankrupt. This court, on an ex parte hearing of said petition, declined to enter such an order, but directed a rule to be issued against the bankrupt, returnable July 6, 1880, to show cause, if any he had, why he did not prosecute his cause and ask for his discharge.

The rule has been returned executed, and still the bankrupt has made no response, nor has he taken any further steps in his causé. I therefore direct the order to he entered:

In re Caleb Kelly, Bankrupt.

The bankrupt having failed to prosecute his cause with diligence, and failed to show cause why he does not prosecute [220]*220it and ask a discharge, it is adjudged that there has been unreasonable delay upon the part of the bankrupt in presenting his cause and asking for a discharge, and upon motion of Jones, Berry, and other creditors, it is now ordered that said creditors, and all others who have proven their debts against said bankrupt, have leave to prosecute any and all suits in law or equity they or either of them could have done had said Kelly never been adjudged a bankrupt. It further is ordered that said Jones and Berry, petitioning creditors herein, recover of said Caleb Kelly their costs expended herein, and may have execution therefor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bare, D. J.

In this case Caleb Kelly filed his petition, to he adjudged a bankrupt, on the second of May, 1878, and was so adjudged on the tenth of May, 1878.

He reported some encumbered real estate and a little personal property, but all” seems to have been set apart to him under the exemption laws.

oThe bankrupt filed his petition for a discharge February 15, 1879, and at the meeting some of his creditors opposed his discharge, and filed grounds why the discharge should not be granted. No further action seems to have been taken by tho. bankrupt. Berry, Jones & Hiter, creditors, who had proven their claims, filed a petition in this court October 8, 1879, asking to he allowed to pursue their legal remedies in the state courts against the bankrupt. This court, on an ex parte hearing of said petition, declined to enter such an order, but directed a rule to be issued against the bankrupt, returnable July 6, 1880, to show cause, if any he had, why he did not prosecute his cause and ask for his discharge.

The rule has been returned executed, and still the bankrupt has made no response, nor has he taken any further steps in his causé. I therefore direct the order to he entered:

In re Caleb Kelly, Bankrupt.

The bankrupt having failed to prosecute his cause with diligence, and failed to show cause why he does not prosecute [220]*220it and ask a discharge, it is adjudged that there has been unreasonable delay upon the part of the bankrupt in presenting his cause and asking for a discharge, and upon motion of Jones, Berry, and other creditors, it is now ordered that said creditors, and all others who have proven their debts against said bankrupt, have leave to prosecute any and all suits in law or equity they or either of them could have done had said Kelly never been adjudged a bankrupt. It further is ordered that said Jones and Berry, petitioning creditors herein, recover of said Caleb Kelly their costs expended herein, and may have execution therefor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelly-kyed-1880.