in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D.
This text of in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D. (in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00082-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE KELLY KILCOYNE, M.D.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On March 3, 2022, relator Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D. filed a petition for writ of mandamus
asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by striking the designation of Stryker
Corporation and J. J. Trujillo as responsible third parties. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE ANN. § 33.004. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Mary Jorgenson,
or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but
not limited to Valley Baptist Medical Center, file a response to the petition for writ of
mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 7th day of March, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelly-kilcoyne-md-texapp-2022.