in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 2022
Docket13-22-00082-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D. (in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00082-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE KELLY KILCOYNE, M.D.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

On March 3, 2022, relator Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D. filed a petition for writ of mandamus

asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by striking the designation of Stryker

Corporation and J. J. Trujillo as responsible third parties. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 33.004. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Mary Jorgenson,

or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but

not limited to Valley Baptist Medical Center, file a response to the petition for writ of

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 7th day of March, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 33.004
Texas CP § 33.004

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Kelly Kilcoyne, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kelly-kilcoyne-md-texapp-2022.