In re Keller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Keller

649 A.2d 430

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 11, 1994

DocketNo. 491, Disciplinary Docket No. 2; No. 6 DB 83-Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 649 A.2d 430 (In re Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Keller, 649 A.2d 430 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 20, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 20, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 A.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-keller-pa-1994.